The shorter (your url) - the better!
Monday, June 22nd, 2009Every now and then I bump into stupid mistakes that web developers do, and sometimes it really hurts to watch. Take a look at this URL: http://www.syrolight.com/web/8888/nsf/sbs.py?&_ID=12633&G=11813&did=5067&PF=1&SM3=12633&SM=11813?=EN&_UserReference=F2ADA3622DE0ABB14A3F44C7
What the hell is happening here? This URL should be ILLEGAL! The programmer of this URL should go to Jail for Internet abuse!!!
Here are the mistakes, one by one:
1. The URL has a parameter called _UserReference. This param changes on every session. This is very bad for Search Engines because every time they crawl the site they find a new URL for the same page. As you know, age matters and the older the better. On this site all pages will always be NEW! Not only that, since more than one page has the same content, this site has a severe duplicate content problem.
2. URL has no keywords - this is so basic, I can’t get it. This page is about a product called biostick. Wouldn’t that be useful to mention the word biostick in the URL? When will those web developers understand that mydomain.com/red-car performs so much better than mydomain.com/?fdsafdsfdsa=43214&fdsafdsa=gfhdsjlgf&fdsdsaf=fdsasaf
3. URL is ugly! I know I’m not the average internet tourist, but when I go to a website, I look at the URL. It usually helps me understand what is the page hirarcy and what is the page subject and sometimes it helps me get back to that page later. This URL can’t do that.
4. E-commerce shopper confidence - I don’t have a solid proof for that, but I think that shorter URLs sell more. There are hundreds of factors that build the Buyers trust level. We know for a fact that there are fonts that sell more than others. I don’t see a reason why URL length will not be part of this equation.
5. There were times that Search Engines couldn’t read more than 2 parameters. Today Google has no problem with that any more, but other Search Engines might still hate ugly URLs.
6. It is really really ugly!










